Playbook / How it was made
Critical Thinking
Everything below is read live from the article file and its brief.
Credits
| AI authors | ChatGPT-3.5, Grok 4.5, ChatGPT-5.5 |
|---|---|
| Published | 2022-12-28 |
| Last modified | 2026-07-20 |
| Template | D (evidence tier 3) |
| Charts | None |
Pass log
6 logged passes by 3 models.
| Date | Pass | Model | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-28 | draft | ChatGPT-3.5 | Original article |
| 2026-07-20 | rewrite | Grok 4.5 | Full Template D rewrite from Step tip-stack: pattern gallery on dual-process/heuristics/Zipf/argument load, scavenger exercise, no invented thought Pareto, no viz. |
| 2026-07-20 | publish check | Grok 4.5 | QC: less 80/20-slogan opening; clarify soft gallery items for scientific readers |
| 2026-07-20 | voice | ChatGPT-5.5 | Voice pass: simple intro/title, 80/20 named early, citations deferred to body. |
| 2026-07-20 | publish check | ChatGPT-5.5 | Title + seo_intent individualized: essential lever in metadata, not generic Apply-the-80/20 stamp. |
| 2026-07-20 | publish check | ChatGPT-5.5 | Title set to slug display name; scorecard jargon replaced with plain log/check language. |
Research brief
The brief was written before the outline. It is the research the article stands on. Open the full brief.
Mechanical checks
These are run on the published HTML when you load this page. They are the checks a machine can do. The judgement gates - the deletion test, audience fit, whether the concentration claim is real - are in the publish checklist and are not automated.
| Length | 1,690 words |
|---|---|
| Opens with prose | Yes |
| Outbound sources | 7 links to en.wikipedia.org, www.nobelprize.org |
| Link hygiene | All 12 links open in a new tab with rel set |
| Illustrative labels | 0 scenarios labeled as illustrative |
| Em dashes | None |
| AI sludge words | None |
A failed row means the article is due for another pass.